data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956ca/956ca46901d56402dced671d2085a987c1d6e925" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2076/c207661ba3965bc06072cbfeae3612fdf76913e6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/570f9/570f9a36f5460a9e8295122caa4345fdfd8a3523" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a4c/44a4ce489e55df6b27b933aa1ab3501077c50807" alt=""
There was just one series that played with exposure time (long exposure, really cool stuff). Just one picture with double exposure (which was really good). And two portrait series with fantastic lighting and different picture compositions. Oh and one really nice series with flower still lifes. Except for that...
I'll definitely send in some of my lomographies next year. There is a good chance I make the cut.
I was originally going to post that I LOVE THAT FIRST PHOTO, but now also: Maybe the reviewers of this F-stop-thing were more interested in subject matter and approach rather than composition?
ReplyDelete